Protecting military equipment from enemy missiles is a critical mission in modern warfare. To counter the threat from Russian-made anti-tank missiles, the US Army recently selected BAE Systems' RAVEN jammer. The development of this new soft-kill system will provide important protection capabilities for US armored vehicles, ensuring combat effectiveness in combat.
Advantages of BAE RAVEN signal jammer
BAE's RAVEN GPS jammer stood out in the Army's "Soft Kill Competition". In this competition, the Army fired live anti-tank guided missiles (ATGMs) at three competitors to evaluate their anti-missile capabilities.
- Multi-Function Countermeasures: BAE RAVEN is a multi-function countermeasure system (MFCM) that is able to effectively counter multiple types of missiles and threats. In tests with other systems such as Northrop Grumman's MEOS and Lockheed Martin's CLOUD, RAVEN demonstrated its strong jamming capabilities, which made it stand out in the military's selection.
- Soft Kill Technology: Compared with hard kill systems, RAVEN uses soft kill technology, which can deceive and blind incoming missiles through electronic interference. This method does not consume physical ammunition and can be used continuously in multiple attacks, increasing the flexibility and durability of the system.
- Integration with hard kill systems: RAVEN can work in conjunction with the Israeli-made Iron Fist hard kill system to form a layered active protection. This dual defense strategy allows the Army to choose to use soft kill or hard kill methods as needed when facing different types of threats, thereby improving the overall combat effectiveness.
Although the US Army has not yet officially purchased BAE RAVEN, the deployment of the system is seen as an important measure to cope with the increasingly severe security situation. In particular, Russian-made anti-tank missiles are widely used by conventional armies and guerrillas around the world, and effective protection measures must be taken.
Technical Background and Competitors
At the Redstone Army Test Center in Alabama, the RAVEN wireless drone jammer won the competition with Northrop Grumman's Multifunction Electro-Optical System (MEOS) and Lockheed Martin's Improved Color Light Deflection Operational Unit (CLOUD). As a multi-functional countermeasure system (MFCM), RAVEN not only has the ability to jam missiles, but also can be integrated with other protection systems.
The next step is to install RAVEN on the M2 Bradley Fighting Vehicle for a "layered demonstration", that is, to integrate soft-kill and hard-kill systems on the same platform, coordinated by the Modular Active Protection System (MAPS) developed by the Army. The effective integration of such systems will greatly enhance the survivability of armored vehicles in combat.
More national signal jammer news, welcome to:military signal jammer,UAV signal blocker news
Integration and Future Development
In order to fully utilize the role of hard-kill and soft-kill systems, coordination between vehicles is essential. The MAPS project aims to create an open-architecture modular APS Framework (MAF) that can be used by any existing or future armored vehicle. This design allows the military to easily integrate new technologies from different suppliers to ensure that vehicles always remain at the forefront of protection.
With the outbreak of the Ukrainian conflict, the aggressive behavior of the Russian army has highlighted the importance of protection systems. The U.S. Army realizes that it must strengthen its protection capabilities as soon as possible to ensure the survival of the army in future battles. The soft-kill demonstration of the MAPS project will also be the first field test of thisgoal, which is scheduled to be carried out at the Redstone Test Center from July to September this year.
In the process of selecting the BAE RAVEN jammer, the U.S. Army not only considered its technical advantages, but also paid more attention to its practical application potential in complex battlefield environments. By integrating soft-kill and hard-kill systems, the Army can effectively improve the survivability of armored vehicles and ensure that it maintains combat effectiveness when facing diverse threats such as Russian-made missiles. In the future, as technology continues to advance, the Army will continue to explore more advanced protection systems to meet the challenges of future wars.
